From: Justin Perras [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 5:34 PM
Subject: On behalf of Phoenix Ancient Art
Below is a statement on behalf on Phoenix Ancient Art in response to the allegations made on Museum Security about Ali Aboutaam.
I would kindly request that you post the statement in its entirety to your blog, as it sets the record straight with regard to the real situation with Ali in Bulgaria, which was not as stated by Mr. Brand.
In fact, Reuters, which initially wrote the story, has since written a corrected version that is completely accurate. The story can be read at http://af.reuters.com/article/topNews/idAFJOE50J04H20090120.
Thank you for reading, and I trust that in fairness you will post the below statement.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Last week, Reuters wrote a highly misleading story that alleged wrongdoing by Ali Aboutaam in an old legal case brought against him and others in Egypt. The story was misleading in two very serious ways:
First, it did not report what ultimately happened to Ali in Bulgaria — Ali was allowed to return home to Switzerland after Bulgarian courts determined, after a full hearing, that Egypt’s legal procedures were seriously deficient and that Ali never had a chance to challenge the charges against him.
Second, the article did not mention that Egyptian courts threw out the charge in which Ali was named.
The plain, indisputable facts are as follows.
When Ali traveled to Bulgaria recently, he was detained until Bulgaria could evaluate Egypt’s request to extradite Ali on a very old charge of smuggling. Ali was not in jail; he was restricted to Bulgaria and lived at his family’s home. After a thorough evaluation of the Egyptian request, Bulgarian courts rejected it as totally unacceptable. Bulgaria reached this decision based on its explicit finding that the Egyptian procedures by which Ali’s conviction had been obtained fell below the most basic protections of any civilized nation. Ali was convicted without being told of the charge against him, without being present and without even having legal representation. In addition, Bulgaria found that it could not even fully understand what Ali was charged with.
Not only was Egypt’s request firmly rejected — an extremely unusual action in extradition law — but on top of that, it became clear that Egypt had not told Bulgaria that Egypt’s own courts exonerated the people who were charged with Ali and had been told of the charges. In other words, the people who supposedly agreed with Ali to improperly trade in antiquities but who were told of the charges and, being in Egypt, went to trial, were all ultimately found not guilty. In addition, the Egyptian courts criticized the Egyptian prosecution as biased. A translation of the Egyptian court’s decision reads, in part: “The judgment [against Ali Aboutaam] became an excuse by the prosecutor to gain the advantage he wanted, in a matter which would be more suitable to refuse, according to the evidence…[T]he appealed judgment was made because the district attorney’s office had presented all its supporting evidence for the accusations and analyzed this accusatory evidence in detail one after the other, and ignored all the evidence that indicated innocence.”
So, although you would never have known this from the Reuters story:
• Ali is free and is at home in Switzerland after Bulgaria rejected Egypt’s request.
• Ali ‘s detention in Bulgaria (a detention where he could travel within Bulgaria) was not based on any finding of guilt but, instead, on Bulgaria having to hold him until it could evaluate and ultimately reject Egypt’s request.
• Ali’s co-defendants who stood trial in Egypt were ultimately ACQUITTED for lack of evidence to support Egypt’s claims .
At Phoenix Ancient Art, we continue to pride ourselves on our transparency and dedication to complying with and working with law enforcement to ensure the integrity of this trade in all nations.